Objective To investigate the analgesic efficacy, block characteristics, and adverse reactions of dural puncture epidural (DPE) for labor analgesia.
Methods A total of 135 parturients with singleton pregnancies who entered labor and planned to receive neuraxial labor analgesia at Wanyuan People′s Hospital from June 1 to December 31, 2025 were selected into this study. They were assigned to DPE group (n=43), epidural analgesia (EP) group (n=47) and combined spinal-epidural analgesia (CSE) group (n=45) using a random number table method. The following outcomes were compared among the three groups: uterine contraction parameters during six consecutive contractions after drug administration, including uterine contraction pressure, contraction duration, and contraction interval; visual analogue scale (VAS) scores and lower-limb motor block, assessed by the modified Bromage score, at 5, 10, 20, and 30 min after analgesia; the number of effective patient-controlled epidural analgesia (PCEA) bolus attempts, duration of analgesia, total consumption of analgesic solution, duration of labor stages, anesthesia and obstetric interventions, maternal satisfaction score, labor analgesia-related adverse events, neonatal Apgar scores, and arterial blood gas analysis results. The procedures of this study complied with the regulations of the Medical Ethics Committee of Wanyuan People′s Hospital and were approved by the committee (Approval No. LLSC-KY-202201). All participants signed informed consent forms for trial of vaginal delivery, neuraxial labor analgesia, and participation in this clinical study.
Results ①There were no statistically significant differences in general characteristics, including maternal age, body weight, and height, among the three groups (P>0.05). ② In terms of analgesic efficacy, there were statistically significant differences in the overall comparison of VAS scores among the three groups at 5, 10, 20, and 30 min after analgesia (P<0.05). Further pairwise comparisons showed that, at each time point, VAS scores in the CSE group were lower than those in the EP and DPE groups, and VAS scores in the DPE group were lower than those in the EP group, with statistically significant differences (P<0.017). ③In terms of uterine contraction-related parameters, there were statistically significant differences in the overall comparisons of the 3rd, 5th, and 6th uterine contraction pressures and the 1st and 3rd uterine contraction intervals after drug administration among the three groups (P<0.05). Further pairwise comparisons showed that the 3rd and 6th uterine contraction pressures were lower in the CSE group than those in the EP and DPE groups; the 5th uterine contraction pressure was higher in the DPE group than that in the EP and CSE groups; the 1st uterine contraction interval was shorter in the CSE group than that in the EP and DPE groups; and the 3rd uterine contraction interval was longer in the DPE group than that in the EP and CSE groups, with statistically significant differences (P<0.017). There were no statistically significant differences in the overall comparisons of the durations of six consecutive uterine contractions among the three groups (P>0.05). ④In terms of labor analgesia-related parameters and labor duration, there were no statistically significant differences in the number of effective PCEA bolus attempts, duration of analgesia, total consumption of analgesic solution, or durations of the first, second, and third stages of labor among the three groups (P>0.05). ⑤In terms of lower-limb motor block, the modified Bromage scores in the CSE group were higher than those in the EP and DPE groups at 5 and 10 min after analgesia, and higher than those in the EP group at 20 min after analgesia, with statistically significant differences (P<0.017). ⑥In terms of adverse events and interventions, there were no statistically significant differences in the incidences of maternal hypotension, fever, pruritus, or anesthesia intervention among the three groups (P>0.05). There were statistically significant differences in the overall comparisons of the incidence of fetal heart rate abnormalities and the rate of obstetric intervention (P<0.05); however, further pairwise comparisons showed no statistically significant differences (P>0.017). ⑦There were no statistically significant differences in maternal satisfaction scores, neonatal Apgar scores at 1, 5, and 10 min after birth, or arterial blood gas analysis results among the three groups (P>0.05).
Conclusions DPE for labor analgesia can improve the early analgesic efficacy of EP and is associated with less early lower-limb motor block than CSE, without increasing the risk of maternal and neonatal adverse events. DPE has certain advantages in analgesic efficacy, preservation of motor function, and maternal and neonatal safety, and may provide a reference for the selection of neuraxial labor analgesia techniques.