Objective To compare the clinical efficacy of laparoscopic commom bile duct exploration+laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LTCBDE+LC) versus endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography/endoscopic sphincterotomy+laparoscopic cholecystectomy (ERCP/EST+LC) in the treatment of patients with gallbladder stones and non-expanding common bile duct stones.
Methods A retrospective analysis was conducted on the relevant data of 98 patients with gallbladder stones and non-expanding common bile duct stones from August 2020 to August 2025 in Fuyang City Tumor Hospital. 50 patients underwent LTCBDE + LC (surgical group), and 48 patients underwent ERCP/EST + LC (endoscopic group). The preoperative and intraoperative data, postoperative recovery conditions, and complications of the two groups of patients were observed.
Results There was no statistically significant difference in the preoperative baseline data and laboratory tests between the two groups. The intraoperative blood loss of the surgical group (23.68±8.97) ml was comparable to that of the endoscopic group (25.90±9.80) ml, with no significantly statistical difference. The operation time of the surgical group (105.76±21.47) min was significantly shorter than that of the endoscopic group (146.67±23.19) min, with statistical difference (P<0.05). The postoperative time to get out of bed, postoperative defecation time, postoperative removal time of abdominal drainage tube/nasobiliary tube, and postoperative pain score of the surgical group were significantly better than those of the endoscopic group [(6.88±2.36) h, (19.63±4.93) h, (4.02±0.33) d, (2.65±1.08) points], with statistical differences (P<0.05). The postoperative hospital stay and treatment cost of the surgical group (3.84±0.89) days and (25 624.46±2 599.82) yuan were also significantly better than those of the endoscopic group [(6.42±1.15) days, (28 672.56±3 835.13) yuan], with statistical differences (P<0.05). The overall complication rate of the endoscopic group (27.08%) was significantly higher than that of the surgical group (10.00%), with statistical difference (P<0.05).
Conlusions Compared with ERCP/EST + LC, LTCBDE + LC can reduce intraoperative blood loss, accelerate postoperative recovery, reduce treatment costs, and decrease postoperative complications. Under the premise of strictly controlling the surgical indications, it is worthy of clinical application.