Objective To compare the short-term clinical efficacy of the three-arm and four-arm Da Vinci robotic surgical systems in radical resection of sigmoid colon cancer and mid-high rectal cancer, so as to provide reference for clinical application.
Methods A retrospective cohort study was conducted. The clinical data of patients who underwent sigmoid colon or mid-high rectal cancer surgery using the three-arm or four-arm Da Vinci robotic surgical system in the Department of Colorectal Oncological Surgery, the Second Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University from January 2019 to February 2025 were collected. The patients were grouped according to the surgical methods. There were 118 cases in the three-arm group and 87 cases in the four-arm group. The preoperative general data, surgery-related indicators, pathological results, postoperative recovery, complications, and treatment costs of the two groups of patients were compared and analyzed. The differences in short-term clinical efficacy were evaluated through statistical methods.
Results There were no significant differences in the data such as age (t=−1.376, P=0.985), gender composition (χ2=0.624, P=0.430), body mass index (t=1.192, P=0.392), tumor location (χ2=0.673, P=0.412), maximum tumor diameter (t=0.364, P=0.547), and comprehensive TNM staging of the tumor (χ2=0.639, P=0.726) between the two groups of patients. In terms of surgery-related indicators, the operation time of the four-arm group was shorter than that of the three-arm group (t=4.859, P=0.004), the intraoperative blood loss was less (t=3.191, P<0.01), the time to first postoperative exhaust was earlier (t=8.742, P=0.040), and the time to first intake of liquid food after surgery was earlier (t=4.340, P=0.038). In terms of pathological features, there were no statistically significant differences between the two groups in the gross type of the tumor (χ2=0.019, P=0.891), histological type (χ2=0.891, P=0.345), degree of differentiation (χ2=0.993, P=0.609), number of lymph nodes detected (t=1.455, P=0.367), nerve invasion (χ2=2.371, P=0.124), vascular invasion (χ2=0.013, P=0.910), lymphatic vessel invasion (χ2=0.118, P=0.731), circumferential resection margin of tumor (P=1.000), and the upper and lower tumor resection margins (P=1.000). There were no significant differences in the postoperative hospital stay (t=0.182, P=0.534), treatment costs (t=−0.367, P=0.713), and the occurrence of complications (all P>0.05) between the two groups of patients. All patients achieved R0 resection.
Conclusion Compared with the three-arm Da Vinci system, the four-arm Da Vinci system shows better operation efficiency and advantages in postoperative recovery in colorectal cancer surgery, and does not affect the radical resection of the tumor, which is worthy of clinical promotion.