Objective To evaluate the value of electric sequential organ failure assessment (eSOFA), quick sequential organ failure assessment (qSOFA) and system inflammatory reaction syndrome (SIRS) scoring system in predicting the prognosis of patients with sepsis in the non-ICU environment.
Methods Patients with sepsis in 10 non-ICU wards of Peking Union Medical College Hospital from October 2016 to March 2017 were prospectively analyzed. The clinical outcome of survival status 28 days after admission was taken as the prognostic index. The eSOFA, qSOFA and SIRS scores of the patients were calculated and the ROC curve was used to evaluate the prognostic value of eSOFA, qSOFA and SIRS scores.
Results A total of 193 patients met the Sepsis-3 diagnosis criteria. The AUROC of eSOFA, qSOFA and SIRS scores for predicting the prognosis of sepsis patients were 0.766 (95%CI: 0.700-0.824), 0.798 (95%CI: 0.700-0.896) and 0.589 (95%CI: 0.475-0.703) respectively. Among them, qSOFA had the best predictive performance, and both of qSOFA and eSOFA were better than SIRS.
Conclusion In non-ICU wards, qSOFA performed best in predicting prognosis of sepsis patients, eSOFA is the next and SIRS is the worst.